About | GFraizer | Contact

Links

Drudge Report
Fox News
TMZ
Reddit

    Cali-Drivers-Suck.com

RSS


MANAGE BOOKMARKS


USER:

PASS:


LOST PASSWORD
CREATE NEW ACCOUNT

Political post round-ups?
- Keep them coming
- Whocares

Connect




Support Me on Patreon


Support Me
[Main Amazon Wishlist]
[Amazon Emergency Wishlist]


Exclusive Photos
[How to Pump Gas]
[Fat Lady + Donuts]
[Dog Bike]







Wednesday, September 28th, 2016SUGGEST NEWS

Signaled and Triggered #RiggedDebate
Posted by: Nebuchadnezzar on September 28th, 2016 @ 9:37AM

Hahaha. I doubt this is true but who knows!


*facepalm*

The sad thing is a lot of people, notably the 4chan crowd are going to drool and salivate over this as if it's a smoking gun. Idiots. The lot of them. No seriously, who actually buys this crap? Oh no! She scratched her nose so 1 full minute later the moderator allows Hillary to respond...are you serious?

Look, I would have liked to have seen the moderator ask a few more directed questions at Hillary. That said, most of the perceived "moderator is hard on Trump, soft on Hillary" nonsense is Trump's own doing.

1. How many times did Trump interrupt the moderator before he could even finish his question?
2. How many times did he deliberately avoid the question being asked and proceeded to go on a tangent about something else?
3. How many times did Trump interrupt Hillary her during her 2 minute answers? Here's an idea, I'd like to someone run a stop clock to see how many times Trump went over his allotted speaking time vs Hillary.

If you want to make an argument that it's not the moderator's job to fact-check things being said, I'm on board with that. But if you're going to berate the moderator for doing his job to fucking moderate, which includes ensuring the candidates keep within their 2mins/30sec answer/rebuttal windows and hold candidates responsible for addressing the questions being asked - then please go back to watching Monday night Football or WWE Raw as you clearly don't understand the mechanics of a debate.

BiVRiP
- 2016-09-28 10:59:27


How anyone can actually believe that Lester Holt was unbiased is beyond me..... The line of questioning he selected was designed to prop her up. He doesn`t `fact check` her - only Donald. Trump should not agree to any more debates where main stream media left wing blow hards are moderating.

AggieSpirit
- 2016-09-29 11:41:18

COMMENTS (3) | POLITICS | DIGG
COMMENTS
ADD COMMENTS | SEND TO A FRIEND | BOOKMARK | SORT LAST TO FIRST
BiVRiP
General

September 28th, 2016 @ 10:59AM

Registered:
2003-05-11
Location:
Canada
Posts: 2345
*facepalm*

The sad thing is a lot of people, notably the 4chan crowd are going to drool and salivate over this as if it's a smoking gun. Idiots. The lot of them. No seriously, who actually buys this crap? Oh no! She scratched her nose so 1 full minute later the moderator allows Hillary to respond...are you serious?

Look, I would have liked to have seen the moderator ask a few more directed questions at Hillary. That said, most of the perceived "moderator is hard on Trump, soft on Hillary" nonsense is Trump's own doing.

1. How many times did Trump interrupt the moderator before he could even finish his question?
2. How many times did he deliberately avoid the question being asked and proceeded to go on a tangent about something else?
3. How many times did Trump interrupt Hillary her during her 2 minute answers? Here's an idea, I'd like to someone run a stop clock to see how many times Trump went over his allotted speaking time vs Hillary.

If you want to make an argument that it's not the moderator's job to fact-check things being said, I'm on board with that. But if you're going to berate the moderator for doing his job to fucking moderate, which includes ensuring the candidates keep within their 2mins/30sec answer/rebuttal windows and hold candidates responsible for addressing the questions being asked - then please go back to watching Monday night Football or WWE Raw as you clearly don't understand the mechanics of a debate.
meorah
Marine

September 29th, 2016 @ 8:53AM

Registered:
2003-04-10
Location:
Posts: 579
4chan probably came up with this idea anyway. they don't care if it's batshit insane so long as they can convince a small subset of normies that it has legs and then lulz about people actually voting for trump.
AggieSpirit
Peon

September 29th, 2016 @ 11:41AM

Registered:
2004-12-09
Location:
Texas
Posts: 283
How anyone can actually believe that Lester Holt was unbiased is beyond me..... The line of questioning he selected was designed to prop her up. He doesn`t `fact check` her - only Donald. Trump should not agree to any more debates where main stream media left wing blow hards are moderating.


You are unable to add Comments because you are not
logged in. If you have an account please login in now.

You can Create an Account, it takes less then a minute.



Return to top